
Architect Babak Emadi describes plans for the Stowe's Exxon site at a Town Hall workshop Thursday. (Bill Giduz photo)
Developer David Stewart unveiled his proposal for redeveloping the Stowe’s Exxon site on Main Street during a public workshop at Town Hall Thursday, and got an earful from residents about the plan.
Mr. Stewart and his firm, Harris Associates, showed rough drawings and site plans for a 4-story mixed-use building that would sit on the front of the half-acre site, right at the “V” formed by the intersection of South and Main streets.
The brick and glass structure could house ground-floor retail shops and second-floor offices. Residential condominiums, which might have balconies or terraces, could go on the third and fourth floors.
Mr. Stewart introduced the project by noting that he lives on Hillside Drive, only a block from the Exxon. “I have a very vested interest in having this turn out to be something that the town’s proud of and is in line with the (planning) ordinance,” he said.
RESPONDING TO CONCERNS
By the time the workshop ended several hours later, Mr. Stewart was talking about revising the proposal, eliminating a floor and making other changes to reduce the building’s size and impact.
“It’s smaller. That’s what we heard people saying,” Mr. Stewart said around 6:30 p.m., as the workshop was winding down.
Several dozen residents stopped by during the four-hour session. Some had limited concerns, such as whether the building might create parking and traffic on nearby streets, whether there would be room for new trees along the street, and whether it would be pedestrian-friendly.
Speakers listed a variety of uses they’d like to see in the ground floor retail space: a jewelry store, sidewalk café, art movie house, a toy store, or antiques shops.
Doug Surratt, a local business owner, said he liked the sound of the project, and would be interested in renting office space.
Others asked Mr. Stewart and architect Babak Emadi, of the Charlotte firm Urbana, to consider a design more in line with the traditional architecture along Main Street, as opposed to a modern-style glass-and-brick tower.
SOME OPPOSE REDEVELOPMENT
But others questioned the whole idea of redeveloping the site. They seemed unhappy with owner Wayne Stowe’s decision to close the Exxon and sell the site for development. Some said they don’t think Davidson needs more retail space and said they don’t want a large new building in the center of downtown.
(Mr. Stowe told Davidson News & Notes last month he was ready to retire from the auto repair business. He said it has become more difficult to make money in the business and that he had lost many customers to auto dealerships and auto service chains that have opened nearby in recent years. Read our Feb. 6, story, CLICK HERE>)
Resident Bonnie Newell and others wondered why the site needed to be redeveloped. Couldn’t the existing building be renovated into one or two small shops, instead of building a new multi-story building? “Why would the town support yet another claustrophobic” building on Main Street, she wondered.
“It looks overwhelmingly large. I know it’s all about money,” Ms. Newell said. “It looks like Tyson’s Corner, Virginia, to me. It’s, to me, overpowering.”
Two other speakers said they think the 1950s-era gas station building is of historic significance and should be preserved.
Among the most vocal critics Thursday were the Withers family, whose home on Main Street is next door to the gas station. “Why do we feel we need more retail space when there’s empty stores on Main Street?” asked Melissa Withers, who at one point was near tears as she pleaded against the project.
“What kind of people and what kind of noise can we expect?” asked her daughter, Katheryn Withers. She, her mother and sister said they fear new neighbors in a multi-story building would be looking in the windows of their old home.
TIME TO SELL
Mike Kessler, the real estate broker representing Mr. Stowe, said he initially approached buyers who might keep an auto repair business there, or build a new gas station/convenience store. But none were interested in paying what Mr. Stowe was asking.
“This is Mr. Stowe’s retirement,” Mr. Kessler explained. Naturally, he would want to sell for a higher price, he said.
So he began talking to buyers interested in a “higher” use. In February, Mr. Stewart reached an agreement to buy the property. He hopes to complete the purchase in August.
As originally conceived, the four-story building probably would need a variance from local planning rules. But if Mr. Stewart shifts to a 3 1/2-story design, it likely would need only Design Review Board approval, and would not come before the planning board or town board.
Eliminating a floor would probably mean fewer upper-level housing units. That’s likely to come as a disappointment to some residents and others who have already approached Mr. Stewart to express interest in buying units.
Town planner Lauren Blackburn said the town’s planning rules and policies favor the kind of building Mr. Stewart is proposing. “The town wants a mixture of uses to support our economic base, to support transit and other things,” she said.
Mr. Stewart will now work with his architect, Mr. Emadi, and town planning staff to prepare a detailed site plan and building design. Then it will go to the Design Review Board for review. It’s not clear how long that will take.
Mr. Stewart said it’s likely he will present a plan that would not need town board approval, though he may seek the board’s blessing anyway.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE
Feb. 6, 2007, “Exxon station to be sold for development,” including an interview with Wayne Stowe about his decision to sell the business. CLICK HERE>






I agree with Melissa, the building should be in line, height-wise, with other downtown buildings. We barely have enough parking for current downtown shoppers and where will the residents park? Until town planners address the parking problem, and with the current empty stores/office space available, this project should be scaled down. Cars will be lined up and down South Street making a residential area more dangerous for children. Not to mention the visual danger when the IB school adjurns for the day and cars are lined up on the wrong side of the street almost to Goodrum.
Harris and Associates has a very utilitarian approach to architecture and I would also like to see something more in line with the current “look” of downtown. As one gentleman at Archer’s said about the building across the street, “it looks like a dang prison.”
I attended the meeting yesterday, and I was reassured–even excited–by what I learned. We have a tremendous opportunity here to work with a developer who lives a block from the site and an architect from the Elizabeth neighborhood (in Charlotte) who is committed to pedestrian-friendly, green urban design. The sketch they showed us would create a stunning focal point for our downtown, with ample sidewalk space for tree-shaded tables and chairs. At the center peak, the building reaches four stories, but it “cascades” downward to meet the residences on either side. The extra half-story that forms the peak marks the town center the way a cathedral might mark the piazza of a European city. The cascading roof-line breaks up the mass of the structure, making it visually pleasing and harmonious with the surrounding rooflines.
We should remember that the developer has a right to build 3 1/2 stories. The extra 1/2 story that serves as a peak and focal point is not much higher than what is already allowed, and it would require town board approval. By allowing them to propose a 4-story building, we might be able to have more involvement in the design process. If we insist on 3 1/2 stories, we may lose some power of oversight.
I am concerned about parking, but David Stewartt is attentive to this concern. After all, cars could easily choose to park in front of his house, which is just around the corner! The arial photos show that we already have lots of parking lots –and lots of asphalt–downtown. I’d like to see the town partner with CATS and with the Davidson Methodist Church to build mulit-level parking garages in existing lots (either under or above ground), rather than spreading more surface asphalt. I’d also like street parking in residential neighborhoods near the center of town designated for residents only (as they do in old Boston neighborhoods).
As someone who lives 3 doors away from the Exxon, I am very sad to lose Stowe’s–mechanics I like and trust, who know my kids by name and come up the street to recharge a dead car battery. But we can’t force them to stay in business. And there are creative ways we can solve the problems associated with a new building. Let’s not scare off a neighborhood developer! We could end up with a developer who care a lot less about the character of our town.
While I agree that Davidson’s main street could use a focal point, I am afraid that the re-development of the Exxon site could be one of the first steps toward the Birkdaleization of the commercial center of the town. The rush to bring density and commercial tax base should be seriously weighed against the loss of the town most valuable asset, it genuine historical character.
Any new buildings along Main Street need to pay homage to, and not overpower the exiting built environment.